English 317: Restoration & 18th-Century British Literature

Course Information Page

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

 

This Webliography is the end product of a semester-long bibliographic research project, which was created to assist students in becoming better researchers in the field of literary studies and better critical readers of scholarly texts.

 

Each student was given a total of three unique “mini-bibliographic research assignments” to complete during the semester. Each assignment required the student to consult a reference or critical source in response to a particular query. Each student was given a different source to consult, with a query suited to that source. For each assignment students produced the following: (1) an annotated bibliography entry on the source; (2) a summary of the findings regarding the topic that the source was used to explore; (3) a review of the source in terms of user-friendliness and relevance to the assigned task.

Upon completion of the three assignments, each student was asked to revise her assignments in accordance with feedback from the instructor. After revising, each student produced a bibliographic resource website. The website presents the annotated summaries and reviews of the assigned critical and reference materials. The websites are intended to create a large portfolio of reference materials to aid in the production of the final research paper. A final component of the project involved peer evaluation of the individual websites. While given templates for the websites, you can see that each student brought her own unique style and flair to the task! Please take a moment to look at the Student Author pages, located on the Main Project Page.

 

 

Assignment 1: SEL Reviews

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

 

Find your name in the list below. Next to your name is a particular volume, issue, and year of SEL: Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (Call Number: PR1.S82 [Available electronically via Project Muse from 1999-present]). Read the article titled “Recent Studies in the Restoration and Eighteenth Century” for your assigned issue. Then, prepare a five paragraph write-up that meets the following criteria:

 

  1. Identify the recurring critical questions that the author addresses in the recent scholarly books and articles for that year. What are they? What positions are different scholars taking on these questions? What issue(s) do you find most compelling and why?

  2. Choose one scholarly text that the article’s author has reviewed favorably. That text must be one that you believe would be useful to our course (it can be a text discussing one of the authors our course will study or a text offering a specific approach to a theoretical question). First, provide a paraphrased summation of the author’s discussion. Then provide your own explanation as to how and why you believe this work would be relevant to our studies.

  3. Your write-up should follow MLA format and must include a Works Cited page, listing the SEL article you read. It should be organized as follows:

    1. Paragraph 1: Identification of critical questions

    2. Paragraph 2: Summary of different scholar’s opinions

    3. Paragraph 3: The issues you find most compelling and why

    4. Paragraph 4: Paraphrase of author’s review of a single work

    5. Paragraph 5: Your explanation of why/how this single work relates to our course

  4. Submit your write-up to the “Assignments” section on WebCT in a Word 97-2003 compatible format by the due date.

 

Dominique Robertson:              Volume 33 Issue 3 (1993)

Raquel Washington:                  Volume 34 Issue 3 (1994)

Jessica Boyd:                            Volume 35 Issue 3 (1995)

Fairren Thompson:                    Volume 36 Issue 3 (1996)

Irene Delilly:                             Volume 37 Issue 3 (1997)

Tiffany Tolliver:                         Volume 38 Issue 3 (1998)

Kristen McNeil:                        Volume 39 Issue 3 (1999)

Ashley Mims:                            Volume 40 Issue 3 (2000)

Laura Allen:                              Volume 41 Issue 3 (2001)

Whitney Robinson:                    Volume 42 Issue 3 (2002)

Krystle Sherman:                      Volume 43 Issue 3 (2003)

Serena Holloman:                     Volume 44 Issue 3 (2004)

Kyla Berry:                               Volume 45 Issue 3 (2005)

Kara Yates:                              Volume 46 Issue 3 (2006)

Yakesha Cooper:                     Volume 47 Issue 3 (2007)       

 

Assignment 2: Critical Website Reviews

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

 

For this assignment, we will be examining internet resources for Restoration & 18th-century studies. Any internet research in literary studies should begin with the following websites: 1) the Voice of the Shuttle, compiled by Alan Liu at UC Santa Barbara; and 2) Andromeda, compiled by Jack Lynch at Rutgers. Each website contains comprehensive listings of various resources, organized by period. Your research, though, will take you beyond these two starter sites to look at individual websites they recommend…

Your task will be to locate the website linked to your name in the list below. You will evaluate the website and provide an annotated bibliography of it, addressing the following:

  1. Review the website to determine its focus. What is the website’s purpose? What kind of information is it presenting?
  2. Who is the intended audience (scholars, general readers, &c)?
  3. Does the website provide a rationale for its organization and content (often located on the Home or About page)? If so, does the rationale make sense? If not, is it readily apparent?
  4. Is the information readable (that is, does it present the material in an intelligible way)? Are there any barriers or obstacles to user-friendly access?
  5. If you were doing research on 18th century literature, how would you use this website? What kind of information would you obtain here and how would it apply to this course’s focus?  
  6. Would you use this website again? If so, why? If not, why?

Your annotated bibliography should follow MLA format and must include a Works Cited page, listing the website you consulted. It can be organized as follows:

Point 1: Summary of the website’s content and purpose

Point 2: Discussion of the organization and presentation of information

Point 3: Evaluation as to usefulness for literary research

 Submit your write-up to the “Assignments” section on WebCT in a Word 97-2003 compatible format by the due date.

 Assigned Websites

Laura Allen:                              The Dictionary of Sensibility

Kyla Berry:                               Recent Sources for Eighteenth Century Studies

Jessica Boyd:                            Early Eighteenth Century Newspaper Reports

Yakesha Cooper:                     Internet Library of Early Journals          

Irene Delilly:                             The World of London Theater

Serena Holloman:                     Augustan Satire

Kristen McNeil:                        British History Online

Ashley Mims:                            Restoration Print Culture

Dominique Robertson:              The European Enlightenment

Whitney Robinson:                    The Literary Gothic

Krystle Sherman:                      Women and Eighteenth-Century English Literature

Fairren Thompson:                    Eighteenth Century Studies

Tiffany Tolliver:                         18th Century Costume Terminology

Raquel Washington:                  Women Writers Project

Kara Yates:                              Eighteenth-Century English Novel Research Guide

 

Assignment 3: MLA & WorldCat Search

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

For this assignment, we will be examining two literary research databases to demonstrate how you would begin work on a literature review for a single author. Those databases are the MLA International Bibliography and WorldCat. Both are accessible through the AUC library electronic resources (databases) website. Go to http://www.auctr.edu to begin your search.

Your task will be to run searches in both databases to compile a potential bibliography of resources on your assigned author. See the list at the end of this document for your assignment. In each database, you must at least run the searches listed below. These four search parameters are suggested as the minimum to procure as much information as possible. You may run other searches you deem appropriate.

 

Assigned author name as subject

Assigned author name as keyword

Individual assigned work as subject

A topic of your choosing (e.g., race, gender, class) and author name as keyword  

 

Confine your search to the years 1993-2008. Once you have run these searches, you will narrow your bibliographic list to what you consider to be the top 20 sources on this author. You will then produce a bibliography that includes a listing of these sources in proper MLA citation format. The bibliography will include the following:

 

  1. Introduction: Preface your bibliography with an introductory paragraph that describes how you approached your search. Include the following:
    1. Describe the search parameters you used and their basic results. For each search parameter, how many entries did you pull up? Did you find a lot of cross-over between MLA and WorldCat or did you notice different resources in each? Were there certain searches that were more productive than others? Was there too much information or too little? How did you decide upon the topic you chose to research?
    2. Provide a rationale for your choices. How did you decide upon the sources you included? For example, did there appear to be a great deal of focus on a particular topic that suggested it would be important? Were there authors you recognized from your “Recent Studies in Restoration and 18th-Century Literature” search? Were there titles that simply caught your eye?
  2. Bibliography: Organize your bibliography alphabetically and in accordance with proper MLA format. At the end of each citation, note whether the AUC library owns that particular journal or book. This information will assist your peers in knowing whether they need to interlibrary loan an item that looks like it would useful in their research.    

 

Submit your write-up to the “Assignments” section on WebCT in a Word 97-2003 compatible format by the due date.

 

Assigned Author and Work

 

Laura Allen:                              Frances Burney, Evelina

Kyla Berry:                               Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels

Jessica Boyd:                            Aphra Behn, Oroonoko

Yakesha Cooper:                     Daniel Defoe, Moll Flanders   

Irene Delilly:                             Thomas Gray, “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard”

Serena Holloman:                     Olaudah Equiano, The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano

Kristen McNeil:                        Samuel Johnson, The Rambler and The Idler

Ashley Mims:                            Richard Brinsley Sheridan, The School for Scandal

Dominique Robertson:                John Gay, The Beggar’s Opera

Whitney Robinson:                    Joseph Addison and Richard Steele, the Tatler and the Spectator

Krystle Sherman:                     Margaret Cavendish, Poems and Fancies

Fairren Thompson:                    John Dryden, Absalom and Achitophel

Tiffany Tolliver:                         Alexander Pope, The Rape of the Lock

Raquel Washington:                  William Cowper, “The Task”

Kara Yates:                             Eliza Haywood, The Female Spectator

 

Assignment 1 Evaluation

 

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

 

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

 

The 4th-Hour Enhancement Bibliographic Research Project counts 15% toward your final grade. Each assignment is worth the following points to produce a total of 100 points:

 

Assignment #1:                         25

Assignment #2:                         25

Assignment #3:                         25

Posting the Website:                 15

Peer Evaluation:                        10

 

Total Project Points             100        (15% of your final grade)

 

Assignment #1 Evaluation

Student & Issue Assigned:

 

Item (each item is worth 5 points)

 

Total Points

1. Identify the recurring critical questions that the article presents: How successful was the presentation of those questions? Does the student demonstrate an understanding of the state of the field? 

 

2. Summarize various scholarly opinions on the critical questions: Is the summary effective in identifying which critics take certain positions and why? Does the organization make sense?

 

3. Present the issue you find interesting: Does the student offer a clear rationale for identifying one issue as most important to that year’s studies? Does she relate this issue back to the course material in any way?

 

4. Choose one scholarly text: Does the student provide a useful summary of the text’s argument?  Does the student make a compelling case as to how this text relates to the course?

 

5. Format: Is the write-up in proper MLA format? Does it include a Works Cited page, which would allow others to easily locate this article?

 

 

 

Total Points

 

 

 

Assignment 2 Evaluation

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 3

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

 

The 4th-Hour Enhancement Bibliographic Research Project counts 15% toward your final grade. Each assignment is worth the following points to produce a total of 100 points:

 

Assignment #1:                         25

Assignment #2:                         25

Assignment #3:                         25

Posting the Website:                 15

Peer Evaluation:                        10

 

Total Project Points             100        (15% of your final grade)

 

Assignment #2 Evaluation

 

Item (Items 1-3 are worth 7 points. Item 4 is worth 4 points)

 

Total Points

1. Identify the website’s purpose and intended audience: How successful was the presentation of the website’s focus? Does the student discuss the intended audience? 

 

2. Evaluate the website’s content and organization: Does the student discuss the website’s organization in a way that would assist others when accessing the website? Does the student offer any substantive critique of the website in terms of its accessibility?

 

3. Determine relevance: Does the student identify whether the website would be useful to the course? If so, does she discuss how and why she might use this website in her research?

 

4. Format: Is the write-up in proper MLA format? Does it include a Works Cited page, which would allow others to easily locate this website?

 

 

 

Total Points

 

 

 

Assignment 3 Evaluation

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Sample Revision Suggestions

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top

The 4th-Hour Enhancement Bibliographic Research Project counts 15% toward your final grade. Each assignment is worth the following points to produce a total of 100 points:

 

Assignment #1:                         25

Assignment #2:                         25

Assignment #3:                         25

Posting the Website:                 15

Peer Evaluation:                        10

 

Total Project Points             100        (15% of your final grade)

 

Assignment #3 Evaluation

  

Item (Items 1-3 are worth 7 points. Item 4 is worth 4 points)

 

Total Points

1. Introduction: Does the student effectively describe her search? Does she identify the ways in which the databases were useful? 

 

2. Rationale: Does the student offer a useful rationale for her bibliography?

 

 

3. Bibliography Content: Does the student include sources that adhere to her expressed rationale? Are there critics that should have been included but are not?

 

4. Bibliography Organization: Is the bibliography organized alphabetically? Is it complete? Do the entries follow MLA format? Does the student note whether the AUC library has these sources available?

 

Total Points

 

 

 

 

Sample Revision Suggestions

 

 

The Course

Syllabus

Assignments

SEL Reviews

Website Reviews

MLA & WorldCat Search

Assessment

Assignment 1

Assignment 2

Assignment 3

Peer Reviewer Criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laura Allen

Dr. Niles

English 317

1 February 2008

Recent Studies in the Restoration and Eighteenth Century 2001

 

The critical questions being discussed in the article, Recent Studies in the Restoration and Eighteenth Century[LAN1]  from the Studies in English Literature journal, are all centered on the origins of the novel as well as the origins of genres. Specifically, the scholars, who have produced research in the year 2000, have asked these questions through the context of eighteenth century gender studies, genre studies, and postcolonial studies. Many of the scholars researched this in a specific historical context. They studied the events happening at that point in time to see if they could find where the specific novel types or genres began[LAN2] . For example, according to the scholar’s research on gender studies, feminism began in the 1760’s with women writers who desired to have genres specific to them. (Lamb 633).  At the beginning Jonathan [LAN3] Lamb supports the claim of theses scholars as he talks about the genres of romance and history combined and created by authors such as Jane Austen and Sophia Lee (623).

Many of the scholars felt that novels were a new way of telling history. Michael McKeon sums up the common opinion of the origin of the novel through history when he states, “the novel emerges from an unstable period of history to represent a new division of knowledge and a fresh relation of truth to virtue” (624). However some authors, such as Miranda J. Burgess felt that novels are always changing, so they are capable of not only telling and repairing history, but remixing it as well (625).  Burgess’ argument coincides with that of Mark Salber Phillip’s who believes that it was necessary for history to include a literary genre to keep readers engaged.  Another way that history was “remixed” was through the creation of anthologies. Unfortunately, there were only a few authors, including Leah Price who could successfully reduce text to anthology form, while still maintaining the substance of the original piece[LAN4] .

Some of the more compelling issues in this article are the studies being done through gender. I am reminded of a quote about post-feminism in Steven Lynn’s, Text and Context;“ If the first wave of feminism sought equality for women, then the “second wave” of feminism (it is generally agreed) focused on the distinctive needs of women” (213). This quote reminds us that though women have sought and in some ways gained equality, we still have more work to do. This [LAN5] is where Austen and Lee’s genre of romance and history derived from. This quote is two-fold because it focuses on the second part of feminism which can only be fairly exercised by going back and giving more credit to eighteenth century women writers, which it seems that scholars in the year of 2000 were aiming to do. In order to completely find answers to historical questions such as those that the SEL scholars are asking, both genders of this world should be taken into account.

With that in mind, I believe Jane Austen’s, Northanger Abbey would be a beneficial novel. It is one of the first novels that Lamb mentions and he even states that this novel coexists with Sophia Lee’s, Recess to sum up scholarly research on restoration studies in the year 2000 (623). According to Lamb, Northanger Abbey is a work that questions history, romance and metropolitan authority. It is a piece of work that sets the tone for literary criticism, even though it is a Gothic novel. [LAN6] 

Northanger Abbey, relates to our course because it shows the effects of literature on the individuals of the eighteenth century. Catherine Moreland’s (the protagonist in the story) whole view of life is based on what she has read in novels. She is faced with some harsh realities that make Catherine, as well as readers, wonder about the origin and truthfulness of these novels. This novel is also significant because it displays the views of a woman author through a woman character. I feel as though this novel may also be a lead into how women gained their respect as authors in the eighteenth century. As mentioned above, this novel will also give more insight into the other half of history.

 

Works Cited

 

Lamb, Jonathan. "Recent Studies in the Restoration and Eighteenth Century." Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 41 (2001): 623-665. Project Muse. Galileo. Robert W. Woodruff, Atlanta. 30 Jan. 2008.[LAN7]

 Lynn, Steven. Texts and Contexts. 4th ed. New York: Pearson Longman. 183-209.

 

General Comments:

Great work! See my comments in the assignment, marked [LAN].

 [LAN1]Cite articles properly

 [LAN2]Good identification of the critical questions.

 [LAN3]Always introduce an author with his/her full name.

 [LAN4]This makes it sounds as if Leah Price is anthologizing, rather than writing about the anthology.

 [LAN5]This what?

 [LAN6]I would have liked to see you choose a scholarly text, rather than a novel – that being said, you do a very nice job with Austen’s novel in relating it to the current critical questions.

 [LAN7]You don’t need to cite Project Muse here.

 

 

 

 

MAIN PROJECT PAGE  

Lisa Niles HOME

Back to Top


Dr. Niles's English 317
Copyright © 2008 [Spelman College]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 08/13/09.